|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Previous Player Back to List Next Player |
|
Everyone is talking about him. This should be the first clue that you should look elsewhere. There is no way he is an unknown sleeper any longer and so will go higher then he should. The internet pundits, the T.V. analysts, the radio jocks; over half of the F.F. players out there have heard his name. I live in Seattle and I'm a bit worried. Their schedule is tougher then in the past and the division is getting better across the board. St. Louis could easily re-establish their mystique and beat us twice. A split with one or both of the other two would be disastrous. Seattle's defense is better, and under Mora, worth drafting consideration. The secondary is suspect and that's why St. Louis, who owned the Hawks up to two years ago, could succeed against them. Hasselbeck is a question mark. He can have a fantastic game then stink up the joint. He seems to be inconsistent. This is the year we find out if he simply throws a bad pass or the lack of concentration among his old receivers was the reason for so many game altering drops in the past. Branch has yet to step out and be the elite receiver everyone has always thought he was. This is the year. Engram is a consummate third down receiver and very reliable. Hackett can and probably will win the 2nd spot, but, will that translate into fantasy scoring? Alexander says he's healthy and that's a double edged sword. If he is then he will get the goal line carries as the team is eminently confident in him over a guy like Hackett. If he isnšt then the overall offense will suffer and opposing defenses will key on Hasselbeck. Pollard is a more reliable touchdown threat then Stevens and will be relied on as such. Then there is the line that is still trying to repair the damage from losing Hutch to the Vikings. My gut says let someone else take him early and if he's a value pick later, having been overlooked in the scramble to fill out starters, then grab him then. There are other, sexier sleepers that the national media is not keying on. |
|
|
|